[TIPC]: Use tipc_port_unlock
The file net/tipc/port.c takes a lock using the function tipc_port_lock and
then releases the lock sometimes using tipc_port_unlock and sometimes using
spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock). tipc_port_unlock simply does the
spin_unlock_bh, but it seems cleaner to use it everywhere.
The problem was fixed using the following semantic patch.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@
struct port *p_ptr;
@@
p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...)
...
(
p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...);
|
?- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: Jon Paul Maloy <maloy@donjonn.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/tipc/port.c b/net/tipc/port.c
index 7608815..f508614 100644
--- a/net/tipc/port.c
+++ b/net/tipc/port.c
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*isunreliable = port_unreliable(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*isunrejectable = port_unreturnable(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@
u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(!connected)) {
if (unlikely(published))
goto reject;
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@
case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
tipc_msg_event cb = up_ptr->msg_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(connected))
goto reject;
if (unlikely(!cb))
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@
case TIPC_NAMED_MSG:{
tipc_named_msg_event cb = up_ptr->named_msg_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(connected))
goto reject;
if (unlikely(!cb))
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@
u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (!connected || !cb)
break;
if (msg_origport(msg) != peer_port)
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@
case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
tipc_msg_err_event cb = up_ptr->err_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (connected || !cb)
break;
skb_pull(buf, msg_hdr_sz(msg));
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@
tipc_named_msg_err_event cb =
up_ptr->named_err_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (connected || !cb)
break;
dseq.type = msg_nametype(msg);
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*importance = (unsigned int)msg_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
msg_set_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr, (u32)imp);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}