[PATCH] ll_rw_blk: cleanup __make_request()
- Don't assign variables that are only used once.
- Kill spin_lock() prefetching, it's opportunistic at best.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
index b1ea941..e25b4cd 100644
--- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -2885,17 +2885,11 @@
static int __make_request(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio)
{
struct request *req;
- int el_ret, rw, nr_sectors, cur_nr_sectors, barrier, err, sync;
- unsigned short prio;
- sector_t sector;
+ int el_ret, nr_sectors, barrier, err;
+ const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
+ const int sync = bio_sync(bio);
- sector = bio->bi_sector;
nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio);
- cur_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
- prio = bio_prio(bio);
-
- rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
- sync = bio_sync(bio);
/*
* low level driver can indicate that it wants pages above a
@@ -2904,8 +2898,6 @@
*/
blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
- spin_lock_prefetch(q->queue_lock);
-
barrier = bio_barrier(bio);
if (unlikely(barrier) && (q->next_ordered == QUEUE_ORDERED_NONE)) {
err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -2953,9 +2945,9 @@
* not touch req->buffer either...
*/
req->buffer = bio_data(bio);
- req->current_nr_sectors = cur_nr_sectors;
- req->hard_cur_sectors = cur_nr_sectors;
- req->sector = req->hard_sector = sector;
+ req->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
+ req->hard_cur_sectors = req->current_nr_sectors;
+ req->sector = req->hard_sector = bio->bi_sector;
req->nr_sectors = req->hard_nr_sectors += nr_sectors;
req->ioprio = ioprio_best(req->ioprio, prio);
drive_stat_acct(req, nr_sectors, 0);
@@ -2973,7 +2965,7 @@
* Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
* Returns with the queue unlocked.
*/
- req = get_request_wait(q, rw, bio);
+ req = get_request_wait(q, bio_data_dir(bio), bio);
/*
* After dropping the lock and possibly sleeping here, our request