libata: don't check whether to use DMA or not for no data commands
There's no reason to check whether to use DMA or not for no data
commands. Don't do it. While at it, make local variable using_pio in
atapi_xlat() set iff ATAPI_PROT_PIO is going to be used and rename
ata_check_atapi_dma() to atapi_check_dma() for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
index 4514283..1cf803a 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
extern void ata_qc_free(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void ata_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void __ata_qc_complete(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
-extern int ata_check_atapi_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
+extern int atapi_check_dma(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void swap_buf_le16(u16 *buf, unsigned int buf_words);
extern void ata_dev_init(struct ata_device *dev);
extern void ata_link_init(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_link *link, int pmp);