FS: Use stable writes when not doing a bulk flush
If we're only doing a single write, and there are no other unstable
writes being queued up, we might want to just flip to using a stable
write RPC call.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
index f88522b..cb2add4 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
#define FLUSH_STABLE 4 /* commit to stable storage */
#define FLUSH_LOWPRI 8 /* low priority background flush */
#define FLUSH_HIGHPRI 16 /* high priority memory reclaim flush */
+#define FLUSH_COND_STABLE 32 /* conditional stable write - only stable
+ * if everything fits in one RPC */
#ifdef __KERNEL__
diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_page.h b/include/linux/nfs_page.h
index 90907ad..92d54c8 100644
--- a/include/linux/nfs_page.h
+++ b/include/linux/nfs_page.h
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
size_t pg_count;
size_t pg_bsize;
unsigned int pg_base;
+ char pg_moreio;
struct inode *pg_inode;
int (*pg_doio)(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *);