ext4: Fix spinlock assertions on UP systems
On UP systems without DEBUG_SPINLOCK, ext4_is_group_locked always fails
which triggers a BUG_ON() call.
This patch fixes it by using assert_spin_locked instead.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Minet <vincent@vincent-minet.net>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index e76459c..541bd9a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
if (unlikely(e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap == NULL))
return;
- BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(sb, e4b->bd_group));
+ assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group));
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
if (!mb_test_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap)) {
ext4_fsblk_t blocknr;
@@ -460,7 +460,7 @@
if (unlikely(e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap == NULL))
return;
- BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+ assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
BUG_ON(mb_test_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap));
mb_set_bit(first + i, e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap);
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@
struct super_block *sb = e4b->bd_sb;
BUG_ON(first + count > (sb->s_blocksize << 3));
- BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(sb, e4b->bd_group));
+ assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(sb, e4b->bd_group));
mb_check_buddy(e4b);
mb_free_blocks_double(inode, e4b, first, count);
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@
int ord;
void *buddy;
- BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+ assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
BUG_ON(ex == NULL);
buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, order, &max);
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@
BUG_ON(start + len > (e4b->bd_sb->s_blocksize << 3));
BUG_ON(e4b->bd_group != ex->fe_group);
- BUG_ON(!ext4_is_group_locked(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
+ assert_spin_locked(ext4_group_lock_ptr(e4b->bd_sb, e4b->bd_group));
mb_check_buddy(e4b);
mb_mark_used_double(e4b, start, len);