um: don't bother blocking SIGARLM and SIGUSR1
We used to generate those, but we hadn't done that for a long
time. No need to bother blocking them for signal handlers.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
index 0ced30c..c1a8fa7 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/process.c
@@ -236,20 +236,19 @@
void init_new_thread_signals(void)
{
set_handler(SIGSEGV, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler, SA_ONSTACK,
- SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
set_handler(SIGTRAP, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler, SA_ONSTACK,
- SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
set_handler(SIGFPE, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler, SA_ONSTACK,
- SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
set_handler(SIGILL, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler, SA_ONSTACK,
- SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
set_handler(SIGBUS, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler, SA_ONSTACK,
- SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
signal(SIGHUP, SIG_IGN);
set_handler(SIGIO, (__sighandler_t) sig_handler,
- SA_ONSTACK | SA_RESTART, SIGUSR1, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGALRM,
- SIGVTALRM, -1);
+ SA_ONSTACK | SA_RESTART, SIGIO, SIGWINCH, SIGVTALRM, -1);
signal(SIGWINCH, SIG_IGN);
signal(SIGTERM, SIG_DFL);
}