Quick compiler: restore optimizations

This CL re-enables optizations on the Quick compile path.
Notes:

  o Although all optimization are enabled, several are now useless
    because of llvm and bitcode constraints:
      - Large method de-optimization (i.e. - skipping expensive dataflow
        analysis) can't be done because we have to do the analysis to
        produce a CFG that makes the bitcode verifier happy.
      - Small method pattern matching isn't applicable w/ bitcode (though
        I can probably do something similar in the Quick backend, but
        looking for bitcode instead of dex patterns).
      - Branch fusing doesn't translate to bitcode.
      - Bitcode generation has de-optimized code layout.  We'll try to
        repair the damage in a subsequent CL.

  o There is an ugly workaround related to the way we're loading and
    unloading the compiler .so containing llvm. [See comment in compiler.cc]

  o We're still running single-threaded - need to add the magic to allow
    multi-threaded use of llvm.

  o With the CL, the phone boots, all target tests pass and all cts VM
    tests pass (except those being dealt with via a verifier change).

  o Compile time is pretty bad - when flashing it's best to follow
    with an adb sync to avoid on-device compilation of system apps.

Change-Id: I1c98f9e64aefbcbd24b957c71544c28450eb2023
diff --git a/src/compiler/Ralloc.cc b/src/compiler/Ralloc.cc
index f4e735a..623d4ea 100644
--- a/src/compiler/Ralloc.cc
+++ b/src/compiler/Ralloc.cc
@@ -369,8 +369,8 @@
 {
   for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
     LOG(INFO) << StringPrintf("Loc[%02d] : %s, %c %c %c %c %c %c%d %c%d S%d",
-        i, storageName[table[i].location], table[i].wide ? 'W' : 'N',
-        table[i].defined ? 'D' : 'U',
+        table[i].origSReg, storageName[table[i].location],
+        table[i].wide ? 'W' : 'N', table[i].defined ? 'D' : 'U',
         table[i].fp ? 'F' : table[i].ref ? 'R' :'C',
         table[i].highWord ? 'H' : 'L', table[i].home ? 'h' : 't',
         oatIsFpReg(table[i].lowReg) ? 's' : 'r',