add a con of clang vs gcc
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index 0c73491..2c979b9 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
<li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all
the variants we are interested in. clang's support for C++ in
particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
+ <li>GCC's codegen is much more mature than clang's right now. clang is
+ only capable of codegen for small and simple projects and does not yet
+ support debug info.</li>
<li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
<li>GCC does not require a C++ compiler to build it.</li>
</ul>