diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index 5a0fcec..3a884a9 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -539,8 +539,9 @@
 
   NamedDecl *SD = Found.getAsSingle<NamedDecl>();
   if (isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(SD)) {
-    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
-      // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
+    if (!ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope &&
+        !getLangOpts().CPlusPlus0x) {
+      // C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p4:
       //   [...] If the name is found in both contexts, the
       //   class-name-or-namespace-name shall refer to the same entity.
       //
@@ -548,6 +549,8 @@
       // into the current scope (the scope of the postfix-expression) to
       // see if we can find the same name there. As above, if there is no
       // scope, reconstruct the result from the template instantiation itself.
+      //
+      // Note that C++11 does *not* perform this redundant lookup.
       NamedDecl *OuterDecl;
       if (S) {
         LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, &Identifier, IdentifierLoc, 
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index b5b99f9..35d3cfa 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -354,12 +354,14 @@
     return;
   }
 
-  if (S && !ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope) {
-    // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
+  if (S && !ObjectType.isNull() && !ObjectTypeSearchedInScope &&
+      !(getLangOpts().CPlusPlus0x && !Found.empty())) {
+    // C++03 [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
     //   [...] If the lookup in the class of the object expression finds a
     //   template, the name is also looked up in the context of the entire
     //   postfix-expression and [...]
     //
+    // Note: C++11 does not perform this second lookup.
     LookupResult FoundOuter(*this, Found.getLookupName(), Found.getNameLoc(),
                             LookupOrdinaryName);
     LookupName(FoundOuter, S);