Give a code insertion hint for how to fix 'implicit int' warnings and errors.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@65653 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
index bfbf8ab..a1c5dbc 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
@@ -77,7 +77,9 @@
// In C89 mode, we only warn if there is a completely missing declspec
// when one is not allowed.
if (DS.isEmpty())
- Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::warn_missing_declspec);
+ Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::warn_missing_declspec)
+ << CodeModificationHint::CreateInsertion(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ "int");
} else if (!DS.hasTypeSpecifier()) {
// C99 and C++ require a type specifier. For example, C99 6.7.2p2 says:
// "At least one type specifier shall be given in the declaration
@@ -87,7 +89,9 @@
unsigned DK = getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && !getLangOptions().Microsoft?
diag::err_missing_type_specifier
: diag::warn_missing_type_specifier;
- Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), DK);
+ Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), DK)
+ << CodeModificationHint::CreateInsertion(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ "int");
}
// FALL THROUGH.