Don't complain about VLAs of non-POD types when the array type is
dependent. Fixes <rdar://problem/8021385>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@104550 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/c99-variable-length-array.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/c99-variable-length-array.cpp
index 8267701..7dc912a 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/c99-variable-length-array.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/c99-variable-length-array.cpp
@@ -100,3 +100,17 @@
template void f<int>(int); // expected-note{{instantiation of}}
}
+
+namespace rdar8021385 {
+ typedef int my_int;
+ struct A { typedef int my_int; };
+ template<typename T>
+ struct B {
+ typedef typename T::my_int my_int;
+ void f0() {
+ int M = 4;
+ my_int a[M]; // expected-warning{{variable length arrays are a C99 feature, accepted as an extension}}
+ }
+ };
+ B<A> a;
+}