change implicit int warnings to point to the identifier, not the 
start of the declspec.  The fixit still goes there, and we underline
the declspec.  This helps when the start of the declspec came from a
macro that expanded from a system header.  For example, we now produce:

t.c:2:8: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]
static x;
~~~~~~ ^



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69777 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
index b8969a2..50f5071 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
@@ -46,9 +46,11 @@
 /// \brief Convert the specified declspec to the appropriate type
 /// object.
 /// \param DS  the declaration specifiers
+/// \param DeclLoc The location of the declarator identifier or invalid if none.
 /// \returns The type described by the declaration specifiers, or NULL
 /// if there was an error.
-QualType Sema::ConvertDeclSpecToType(const DeclSpec &DS) {
+QualType Sema::ConvertDeclSpecToType(const DeclSpec &DS,
+                                     SourceLocation DeclLoc) {
   // FIXME: Should move the logic from DeclSpec::Finish to here for validity
   // checking.
   QualType Result;
@@ -101,20 +103,29 @@
     if (getLangOptions().ImplicitInt) {
       // In C89 mode, we only warn if there is a completely missing declspec
       // when one is not allowed.
-      if (DS.isEmpty())
-        Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), diag::warn_missing_declspec)
+      if (DS.isEmpty()) {
+        if (DeclLoc.isInvalid())
+          DeclLoc = DS.getSourceRange().getBegin();
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::warn_missing_declspec)
+          << DS.getSourceRange()
         << CodeModificationHint::CreateInsertion(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
                                                  "int");
+      }
     } else if (!DS.hasTypeSpecifier()) {
       // C99 and C++ require a type specifier.  For example, C99 6.7.2p2 says:
       // "At least one type specifier shall be given in the declaration
       // specifiers in each declaration, and in the specifier-qualifier list in
       // each struct declaration and type name."
       // FIXME: Does Microsoft really have the implicit int extension in C++?
-      unsigned DK = getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && !getLangOptions().Microsoft?
-          diag::err_missing_type_specifier
-        : diag::warn_missing_type_specifier;
-      Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), DK);
+      if (DeclLoc.isInvalid())
+        DeclLoc = DS.getSourceRange().getBegin();
+
+      if (getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && !getLangOptions().Microsoft)
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::err_missing_type_specifier)
+          << DS.getSourceRange();
+      else
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::warn_missing_type_specifier)
+          << DS.getSourceRange();
 
       // FIXME: If we could guarantee that the result would be
       // well-formed, it would be useful to have a code insertion hint
@@ -183,13 +194,18 @@
         // id<protocol-list>
         Result = Context.getObjCQualifiedIdType((ObjCProtocolDecl**)PQ,
                                                 DS.getNumProtocolQualifiers());
-      else if (Result == Context.getObjCClassType())
+      else if (Result == Context.getObjCClassType()) {
+        if (DeclLoc.isInvalid())
+          DeclLoc = DS.getSourceRange().getBegin();
         // Class<protocol-list>
-        Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(), 
-             diag::err_qualified_class_unsupported) << DS.getSourceRange();
-      else
-        Diag(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
-             diag::err_invalid_protocol_qualifiers) << DS.getSourceRange();
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::err_qualified_class_unsupported)
+          << DS.getSourceRange();
+      } else {
+        if (DeclLoc.isInvalid())
+          DeclLoc = DS.getSourceRange().getBegin();
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::err_invalid_protocol_qualifiers)
+          << DS.getSourceRange();
+      }
     }
     // TypeQuals handled by caller.
     break;
@@ -592,13 +608,13 @@
   case Declarator::DK_Abstract:
   case Declarator::DK_Normal:
   case Declarator::DK_Operator: {
-    const DeclSpec& DS = D.getDeclSpec();
-    if (OmittedReturnType)
+    const DeclSpec &DS = D.getDeclSpec();
+    if (OmittedReturnType) {
       // We default to a dependent type initially.  Can be modified by
       // the first return statement.
       T = Context.DependentTy;
-    else {
-      T = ConvertDeclSpecToType(DS);
+    } else {
+      T = ConvertDeclSpecToType(DS, D.getIdentifierLoc());
       if (T.isNull())
         return T;
     }