Unresolved implicit member accesses are dependent if the object type is dependent.
Avoids an assertion arising during object-argument initialization in overload
resolution. In theory we can resolve this at definition time if the class
hierarchy for the member is fully known.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@91747 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/member-access-expr.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/member-access-expr.cpp
index 51de64a..116e837 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/member-access-expr.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/member-access-expr.cpp
@@ -105,3 +105,17 @@
x5.f(xp);
x5c.g(cxp);
}
+
+// In theory we can do overload resolution at template-definition time on this.
+// We should at least not assert.
+namespace test4 {
+ struct Base {
+ template <class T> void foo() {}
+ };
+
+ template <class T> struct Foo : Base {
+ void test() {
+ foo<int>();
+ }
+ };
+}