Fix a regression in the two-phase lookup diagnostics that switching the
namespace set algorithm (re-)introduced. We may not have seen the 'std'
namespace, but we should still suggested associated namespaces. Easy
fix, but a bit annoying to test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@132744 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-names-no-std.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-names-no-std.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9ac99f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-names-no-std.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+//
+// The whole point of this test is to verify certain diagnostics work in the
+// absence of namespace 'std'.
+
+namespace PR10053 {
+ namespace ns {
+ struct Data {};
+ }
+
+ template<typename T> struct A {
+ T t;
+ A() {
+ f(t); // expected-error {{call to function 'f' that is neither visible in the template definition nor found by argument dependent lookup}}
+ }
+ };
+
+ void f(ns::Data); // expected-note {{in namespace 'PR10053::ns'}}
+
+ A<ns::Data> a; // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function}}
+}