Be more careful around dependent nested-name-specifiers, complaining
when they are not complete (since we could not match them up to
anything) and ensuring that enum parsing can cope with dependent
elaborated-type-specifiers. Fixes PR6915 and PR6649.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102247 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index e9d206e..89f8aec 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -235,6 +235,16 @@
return false;
DeclContext *DC = computeDeclContext(SS, true);
+ if (!DC) {
+ // It's dependent.
+ assert(isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS) &&
+ "No context for non-dependent scope specifier?");
+ Diag(SS.getRange().getBegin(), diag::err_dependent_nested_name_spec)
+ << SS.getRange();
+ SS.setScopeRep(0);
+ return true;
+ }
+
if (TagDecl *Tag = dyn_cast<TagDecl>(DC)) {
// If this is a dependent type, then we consider it complete.
if (Tag->isDependentContext())
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index b8ff182..bf2cba1 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -5313,7 +5313,7 @@
void Sema::ActOnTagStartDefinition(Scope *S, DeclPtrTy TagD) {
AdjustDeclIfTemplate(TagD);
TagDecl *Tag = cast<TagDecl>(TagD.getAs<Decl>());
-
+
// Enter the tag context.
PushDeclContext(S, Tag);
}
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index 1075f41..14d0456 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -5117,6 +5117,13 @@
}
assert(Keyword != ETK_None && "Invalid tag kind!");
+ if (TUK == TUK_Declaration || TUK == TUK_Definition) {
+ Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_dependent_tag_decl)
+ << (TUK == TUK_Definition) << TagDecl::getTagKindForTypeSpec(TagSpec)
+ << SS.getRange();
+ return true;
+ }
+
return Context.getDependentNameType(Keyword, NNS, Name).getAsOpaquePtr();
}