Reorganize testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@91153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
index 84a8e89..f4fd6b8 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
@@ -1,23 +1,20 @@
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// PR5057
-namespace std {
- class X {
- public:
- template<typename T>
- friend struct Y;
- };
+namespace test0 {
+ namespace std {
+ class X {
+ public:
+ template<typename T> friend struct Y;
+ };
+ }
+
+ namespace std {
+ template<typename T> struct Y {};
+ }
}
-namespace std {
- template<typename T>
- struct Y
- {
- };
-}
-
-
-namespace N {
+namespace test1 {
template<typename T> void f1(T) { } // expected-note{{here}}
class X {
@@ -30,64 +27,58 @@
}
// PR4768
-template<typename T>
-struct X0 {
- template<typename U> friend struct X0;
-};
+namespace test2 {
+ template<typename T> struct X0 {
+ template<typename U> friend struct X0;
+ };
+
+ template<typename T> struct X0<T*> {
+ template<typename U> friend struct X0;
+ };
-template<typename T>
-struct X0<T*> {
- template<typename U> friend struct X0;
-};
+ template<> struct X0<int> {
+ template<typename U> friend struct X0;
+ };
-template<>
-struct X0<int> {
- template<typename U> friend struct X0;
-};
+ template<typename T> struct X1 {
+ template<typename U> friend void f2(U);
+ template<typename U> friend void f3(U);
+ };
-template<typename T>
-struct X1 {
- template<typename U> friend void f2(U);
- template<typename U> friend void f3(U);
-};
+ template<typename U> void f2(U);
-template<typename U> void f2(U);
+ X1<int> x1i;
+ X0<int*> x0ip;
-X1<int> x1i;
-X0<int*> x0ip;
+ template<> void f2(int);
-template<> void f2(int);
+ // FIXME: Should this declaration of f3 be required for the specialization of
+ // f3<int> (further below) to work? GCC and EDG don't require it, we do...
+ template<typename U> void f3(U);
-// FIXME: Should this declaration of f3 be required for the specialization of
-// f3<int> (further below) to work? GCC and EDG don't require it, we do...
-template<typename U> void f3(U);
-
-template<> void f3(int);
+ template<> void f3(int);
+}
// PR5332
-template <typename T>
-class Foo {
- template <typename U>
- friend class Foo;
-};
+namespace test3 {
+ template <typename T> class Foo {
+ template <typename U>
+ friend class Foo;
+ };
-Foo<int> foo;
+ Foo<int> foo;
-template<typename T, T Value>
-struct X2a;
+ template<typename T, T Value> struct X2a;
-template<typename T, int Size>
-struct X2b;
+ template<typename T, int Size> struct X2b;
-template<typename T>
-class X3 {
- template<typename U, U Value>
- friend struct X2a;
+ template<typename T>
+ class X3 {
+ template<typename U, U Value> friend struct X2a;
+ template<typename U, T Value> friend struct X2b;
+ };
- template<typename U, T Value>
- friend struct X2b;
-};
+ X3<int> x3i; // okay
-X3<int> x3i; // okay
-
-X3<long> x3l; // FIXME: should cause an instantiation-time failure
+ X3<long> x3l; // FIXME: should cause an instantiation-time failure
+}