Fix regression in -Wuninitialized involving VLAs. It turns out that we were modeling sizeof(VLAs)
incorrectly in the CFG, and also the static analyzer. This patch regresses the analyzer a bit, but
that needs to be followed up with a better solution.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10008112>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@138372 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Analysis/outofbound-notwork.c b/test/Analysis/outofbound-notwork.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..45e713b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Analysis/outofbound-notwork.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Wno-array-bounds -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,experimental.unix,experimental.security.ArrayBound -analyzer-store=region -verify %s
+// XFAIL: *
+
+// Once we better handle modeling of sizes of VLAs, we can pull this back
+// into outofbound.c.
+
+void sizeof_vla(int a) {
+ if (a == 5) {
+ char x[a];
+ int y[sizeof(x)];
+ y[4] = 4; // no-warning
+ y[5] = 5; // expected-warning{{out-of-bound}}
+ }
+}
+
+void sizeof_vla_2(int a) {
+ if (a == 5) {
+ char x[a];
+ int y[sizeof(x) / sizeof(char)];
+ y[4] = 4; // no-warning
+ y[5] = 5; // expected-warning{{out-of-bound}}
+ }
+}
+
+void sizeof_vla_3(int a) {
+ if (a == 5) {
+ char x[a];
+ int y[sizeof(*&*&*&x)];
+ y[4] = 4; // no-warning
+ y[5] = 5; // expected-warning{{out-of-bound}}
+ }
+}