diff --git a/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
index 124f50c..3b3ab2c 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/DeclSpec.cpp
@@ -1003,8 +1003,7 @@
   // the type specifier is not optional, but we got 'auto' as a storage
   // class specifier, then assume this is an attempt to use C++0x's 'auto'
   // type specifier.
-  // FIXME: Does Microsoft really support implicit int in C++?
-  if (PP.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !PP.getLangOpts().MicrosoftExt &&
+  if (PP.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
       TypeSpecType == TST_unspecified && StorageClassSpec == SCS_auto) {
     TypeSpecType = TST_auto;
     StorageClassSpec = SCS_unspecified;
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
index 7ed1687..2503b49 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
@@ -793,9 +793,7 @@
       // "At least one type specifier shall be given in the declaration
       // specifiers in each declaration, and in the specifier-qualifier list in
       // each struct declaration and type name."
-      // FIXME: Does Microsoft really have the implicit int extension in C++?
-      if (S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
-          !S.getLangOpts().MicrosoftExt) {
+      if (S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus) {
         S.Diag(DeclLoc, diag::err_missing_type_specifier)
           << DS.getSourceRange();