Introduce a new expression type, UnresolvedDeclRefExpr, that describes
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@67308 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
index 156f3a1..9e11961 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaCXXScopeSpec.cpp
@@ -29,6 +29,21 @@
return NNS.computeDeclContext(Context);
}
+bool Sema::isDependentScopeSpecifier(const CXXScopeSpec &SS) {
+ if (!SS.isSet() || SS.isInvalid())
+ return false;
+
+ NestedNameSpecifier NNS
+ = NestedNameSpecifier::getFromOpaquePtr(SS.getCurrentScopeRep());
+
+ if (Type *T = NNS.getAsType())
+ return T->isDependentType();
+
+ // FIXME: What about the injected-class-name of a class template? It
+ // is dependent, but we represent it as a declaration.
+ return false;
+}
+
/// \brief Require that the context specified by SS be complete.
///
/// If SS refers to a type, this routine checks whether the type is