When code-completion after a "," is building an overload set, note
that there is one more argument (the one following the comma) and make
the candidate non-viable if the function cannot accept any argument in
that position.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@82625 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/CodeCompletion/call.cpp b/test/CodeCompletion/call.cpp
index 448b8eb..90bf82b 100644
--- a/test/CodeCompletion/call.cpp
+++ b/test/CodeCompletion/call.cpp
@@ -19,10 +19,10 @@
f(Y(), 0, 0);
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:19:9 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CC1 %s &&
// CHECK-CC1: f(struct N::Y y, <#int ZZ#>)
- // CHECK-NEXT-CC1: f(int i, <#int j#>, int k)
- // CHECK-NEXT-CC1: f(float x, <#float y#>)
+ // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: f(int i, <#int j#>, int k)
+ // CHECK-CC1-NEXT: f(float x, <#float y#>)
// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:19:13 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=CC2 %s &&
- // FIXME: two extra overloads are showing up!
+ // CHECK-CC2-NOT: f(struct N::Y y, int ZZ)
// CHECK-CC2: f(int i, int j, <#int k#>)
// RUN: true
}