be more clear about what we are comparing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44795 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index aa11b5f..dc9f70d 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
<p>Building an entirely new compiler front-end is a big task, and it isn't
always clear to people why we decided to do this. Here we compare clang
and its goals to other open source compiler front-ends that are
- available. We restrict the discussion to very specific technical points
- to avoid controversy where possible. Also, since software is infinitely
- mutable, so focus on architectural issues that are impractical to fix
- without a major rewrite, instead of talking about little details that
- can be fixed with a reasonable amount of effort.</p>
+ available. We restrict the discussion to very specific objective points
+ to avoid controversy where possible. Also, software is infinitely
+ mutable, so we don't talk about little details that can be fixed with
+ a reasonable amount of effort: we'll talk about issues that are
+ difficult to fix for architectural or political reasons.</p>
<p>The goal of this list is to describe how differences in goals lead to
different strengths and weaknesses, not to make some compiler look bad.