Implement lvalue test for conditional expressions.
Add a few commented lines to the test case that point out things that don't work yet.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@69354 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 9fd6226..734b6ce 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -2120,6 +2120,7 @@
ICS->Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
ICS->Standard.DirectBinding = true;
ICS->Standard.RRefBinding = false;
+ ICS->Standard.CopyConstructor = 0;
// Nothing more to do: the inaccessibility/ambiguity check for
// derived-to-base conversions is suppressed when we're
@@ -2273,6 +2274,7 @@
ICS->Standard.ReferenceBinding = true;
ICS->Standard.DirectBinding = false;
ICS->Standard.RRefBinding = isRValRef;
+ ICS->Standard.CopyConstructor = 0;
} else {
// FIXME: Binding to a subobject of the rvalue is going to require
// more AST annotation than this.
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 8f41c00..0539caa 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -1137,6 +1137,35 @@
return true;
}
+/// \brief Perform an "extended" implicit conversion as returned by
+/// TryClassUnification.
+///
+/// TryClassUnification generates ICSs that include reference bindings.
+/// PerformImplicitConversion is not suitable for this; it chokes if the
+/// second part of a standard conversion is ICK_DerivedToBase. This function
+/// handles the reference binding specially.
+static bool ConvertForConditional(Sema &Self, Expr *&E,
+ const ImplicitConversionSequence &ICS)
+{
+ if (ICS.ConversionKind == ImplicitConversionSequence::StandardConversion &&
+ ICS.Standard.ReferenceBinding) {
+ assert(ICS.Standard.DirectBinding &&
+ "TryClassUnification should never generate indirect ref bindings");
+ Self.ImpCastExprToType(E, TargetType(ICS), true);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (ICS.ConversionKind == ImplicitConversionSequence::UserDefinedConversion &&
+ ICS.UserDefined.After.ReferenceBinding) {
+ assert(ICS.UserDefined.After.DirectBinding &&
+ "TryClassUnification should never generate indirect ref bindings");
+ Self.ImpCastExprToType(E, TargetType(ICS), true);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (Self.PerformImplicitConversion(E, TargetType(ICS), ICS, "converting"))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
/// \brief Check the operands of ?: under C++ semantics.
///
/// See C++ [expr.cond]. Note that LHS is never null, even for the GNU x ?: y
@@ -1223,13 +1252,11 @@
// the chosen operand and the converted operands are used in place of the
// original operands for the remainder of this section.
if (HaveL2R) {
- if (PerformImplicitConversion(LHS, TargetType(ICSLeftToRight),
- ICSLeftToRight, "converting"))
+ if (ConvertForConditional(*this, LHS, ICSLeftToRight))
return QualType();
LTy = LHS->getType();
} else if (HaveR2L) {
- if (PerformImplicitConversion(RHS, TargetType(ICSRightToLeft),
- ICSRightToLeft, "converting"))
+ if (ConvertForConditional(*this, RHS, ICSRightToLeft))
return QualType();
RTy = RHS->getType();
}