Improve recovery for template-ids whose template-name doesn't actually
name a template, when they occur in a base-specifier. This is one of
the (few) places where we know for sure that an identifier followed by
a '<' must be a template name, so we can diagnose and recover well:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:9:16: error: missing
'template'
keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'
struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' ...
^
template
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:12:13: error: unknown
template name
'vector'
struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name
'vector'}}
^
2 diagnostics generated.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@93257 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp
index 5697920..2427658 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp
@@ -4,3 +4,9 @@
struct X0 : T::template apply<U> {
X0(U u) : T::template apply<U>(u) { }
};
+
+template<typename T, typename U>
+struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'}}
+
+template<typename T>
+struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name 'vector'}}