If we encounter a friend class template for which we cannot resolve
the nested-name-specifier (e.g., because it is dependent), do not
error even though we can't represent it in the AST at this point.
This is a horrible, horrible hack. The actual feature we still need to
implement (for C++98!) is covered by PR12292. However, we used to
silently accept this code, so when we recently started rejecting it we
caused some regressions (e.g., <rdar://problem/11147355>). This hack
brings us back to the passable-but-not-good state we had previously.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@153752 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
index 152df37..9c95fa0 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/friend-template.cpp
@@ -230,3 +230,16 @@
template <> friend class B; // expected-error{{extraneous 'template<>' in declaration of class 'B'}}
};
}
+
+namespace rdar11147355 {
+ template <class T>
+ struct A {
+ template <class U> class B;
+ template <class S> template <class U> friend class A<S>::B;
+ };
+
+ template <class S> template <class U> class A<S>::B {
+ };
+
+ A<double>::B<double> ab;
+}