Undo a refactor-o and base the bitfield-truncation warning on the
uncoerced value. Also, whitelist bool bitfields, which aren't
really a truncation.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@118778 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c b/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c
index af77741..7c6b9b8 100644
--- a/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c
+++ b/test/Sema/constant-conversion.c
@@ -37,3 +37,21 @@
struct A d = (struct A) { 10, 0 }; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 10 to 2}}
struct A e = { .foo = 10 }; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 10 to 2}}
}
+
+void test4() {
+ struct A {
+ char c : 2;
+ } a;
+
+ a.c = 0x101; // expected-warning {{implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from 257 to 1}}
+}
+
+void test5() {
+ struct A {
+ _Bool b : 1;
+ } a;
+
+ // Don't warn about this implicit conversion to bool, or at least
+ // don't warn about it just because it's a bitfield.
+ a.b = 100;
+}