Fix for PR4382: allow instantiating dependent nested name specifiers.
I'm not completely sure this is the right way to fix this issue, but it seems
reasonable, and it's consistent with the non-template code for this
construct.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@73285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaTemplate/metafun-apply.cpp b/test/SemaTemplate/metafun-apply.cpp
index 7bc971f..9261ed6 100644
--- a/test/SemaTemplate/metafun-apply.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaTemplate/metafun-apply.cpp
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@
template<typename MetaFun, typename T>
struct apply1 {
typedef typename MetaFun::template apply<T>::type type; // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'struct add_reference::apply<void>' requested here}} \
- // expected-error{{'apply' following the 'template' keyword does not refer to a template}} \
- // FIXME: expected-error{{type 'MetaFun::template apply<int>' cannot be used prior to '::' because it has no members}}
+ // expected-error{{'apply' following the 'template' keyword does not refer to a template}}
};
int i;
@@ -36,8 +35,7 @@
apply1<add_reference, void>::type t; // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'struct apply1<struct add_reference, void>' requested here}} \
// FIXME: expected-error{{unexpected type name 'type': expected expression}}
- apply1<bogus, int>::type t2; // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'struct apply1<struct bogus, int>' requested here}} \
- // FIXME: expected-error{{unexpected type name 'type': expected expression}}
+ apply1<bogus, int>::type t2; // expected-note{{in instantiation of template class 'struct apply1<struct bogus, int>' requested here}}
}