PR14279: Work around this major miscompilation by treating move operations as
non-trivial if they would not call a move operation, even if they would in fact
call a trivial copy operation. A proper fix is to follow, but this small
directed fix is intended for porting to the 3.2 release branch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@167920 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp b/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
index 9db3335..82e630a 100644
--- a/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/DeclCXX.cpp
@@ -240,10 +240,13 @@
// -- the constructor selected to copy/move each direct base class
// subobject is trivial, and
// FIXME: C++0x: We need to only consider the selected constructor
- // instead of all of them.
+ // instead of all of them. For now, we treat a move constructor as being
+ // non-trivial if it calls anything other than a trivial move constructor.
if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialCopyConstructor())
data().HasTrivialCopyConstructor = false;
- if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialMoveConstructor())
+ if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialMoveConstructor() ||
+ !(BaseClassDecl->hasDeclaredMoveConstructor() ||
+ BaseClassDecl->needsImplicitMoveConstructor()))
data().HasTrivialMoveConstructor = false;
// C++0x [class.copy]p27:
@@ -255,7 +258,9 @@
// of all of them.
if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialCopyAssignment())
data().HasTrivialCopyAssignment = false;
- if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialMoveAssignment())
+ if (!BaseClassDecl->hasTrivialMoveAssignment() ||
+ !(BaseClassDecl->hasDeclaredMoveAssignment() ||
+ BaseClassDecl->needsImplicitMoveAssignment()))
data().HasTrivialMoveAssignment = false;
// C++11 [class.ctor]p6:
@@ -830,7 +835,9 @@
// FIXME: C++0x: We don't correctly model 'selected' constructors.
if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialCopyConstructor())
data().HasTrivialCopyConstructor = false;
- if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialMoveConstructor())
+ if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialMoveConstructor() ||
+ !(FieldRec->hasDeclaredMoveConstructor() ||
+ FieldRec->needsImplicitMoveConstructor()))
data().HasTrivialMoveConstructor = false;
// C++0x [class.copy]p27:
@@ -842,7 +849,9 @@
// FIXME: C++0x: We don't correctly model 'selected' operators.
if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialCopyAssignment())
data().HasTrivialCopyAssignment = false;
- if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialMoveAssignment())
+ if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialMoveAssignment() ||
+ !(FieldRec->hasDeclaredMoveAssignment() ||
+ FieldRec->needsImplicitMoveAssignment()))
data().HasTrivialMoveAssignment = false;
if (!FieldRec->hasTrivialDestructor())