Semantic analysis for explicit instantiation of class templates. We
still aren't instantiating the definitions of class template members,
and core issues 275 and 259 will both affect the checking that we do
for explicit instantiations (but are not yet implemented).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@71613 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/www/cxx_status.html b/www/cxx_status.html
index 9be7ffc..d85d451 100644
--- a/www/cxx_status.html
+++ b/www/cxx_status.html
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@
<td> 14.7.2 [temp.explicit]</td>
<td class="basic" align="center"></td>
<td class="basic" align="center"></td>
- <td class="broken" align="center"></td>
+ <td class="basic" align="center"></td>
<td class="broken" align="center"></td>
<td>Function templates cannot be instantiated</td>
</tr>