Whenever we complain about a failed initialization of a function or
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102038 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/default2.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/default2.cpp
index a0999c0..d9f1edf 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/default2.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/default2.cpp
@@ -102,7 +102,8 @@
struct ZZ {
static ZZ g(int = 17);
- void f(ZZ z = g()); // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization}}
+ void f(ZZ z = g()); // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization}} \
+ // expected-note{{passing argument to parameter 'z' here}}
ZZ(ZZ&, int = 17); // expected-note{{candidate constructor}}
};