Added rudimentary C++0x attribute support.
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@89543 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp
index 7ac2977..dabd065 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseTentative.cpp
@@ -55,12 +55,11 @@
// using-declaration
// using-directive
case tok::kw_using:
- return true;
- case tok::kw_static_assert:
// static_assert-declaration
+ case tok::kw_static_assert:
return true;
- default:
// simple-declaration
+ default:
return isCXXSimpleDeclaration();
}
}
@@ -351,6 +350,89 @@
return TPR == TPResult::True();
}
+/// isCXX0XAttributeSpecifier - returns true if this is a C++0x
+/// attribute-specifier. By default, unless in Obj-C++, only a cursory check is
+/// performed that will simply return true if a [[ is seen. Currently C++ has no
+/// syntactical ambiguities from this check, but it may inhibit error recovery.
+/// If CheckClosing is true, a check is made for closing ]] brackets.
+///
+/// If given, After is set to the token after the attribute-specifier so that
+/// appropriate parsing decisions can be made; it is left untouched if false is
+/// returned.
+///
+/// FIXME: If an error is in the closing ]] brackets, the program assumes
+/// the absence of an attribute-specifier, which can cause very yucky errors
+/// to occur.
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-specifier:
+/// '[' '[' attribute-list ']' ']'
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-list:
+/// attribute[opt]
+/// attribute-list ',' attribute[opt]
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute:
+/// attribute-token attribute-argument-clause[opt]
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-token:
+/// identifier
+/// attribute-scoped-token
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-scoped-token:
+/// attribute-namespace '::' identifier
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-namespace:
+/// identifier
+///
+/// [C++0x] attribute-argument-clause:
+/// '(' balanced-token-seq ')'
+///
+/// [C++0x] balanced-token-seq:
+/// balanced-token
+/// balanced-token-seq balanced-token
+///
+/// [C++0x] balanced-token:
+/// '(' balanced-token-seq ')'
+/// '[' balanced-token-seq ']'
+/// '{' balanced-token-seq '}'
+/// any token but '(', ')', '[', ']', '{', or '}'
+bool Parser::isCXX0XAttributeSpecifier (bool CheckClosing,
+ tok::TokenKind *After) {
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::l_square) || NextToken().isNot(tok::l_square))
+ return false;
+
+ // No tentative parsing if we don't need to look for ]]
+ if (!CheckClosing && !getLang().ObjC1)
+ return true;
+
+ struct TentativeReverter {
+ TentativeParsingAction PA;
+
+ TentativeReverter (Parser& P)
+ : PA(P)
+ {}
+ ~TentativeReverter () {
+ PA.Revert();
+ }
+ } R(*this);
+
+ // Opening brackets were checked for above.
+ ConsumeBracket();
+ ConsumeBracket();
+
+ // SkipUntil will handle balanced tokens, which are guaranteed in attributes.
+ SkipUntil(tok::r_square, false);
+
+ if (Tok.isNot(tok::r_square))
+ return false;
+ ConsumeBracket();
+
+ if (After)
+ *After = Tok.getKind();
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/// declarator:
/// direct-declarator
/// ptr-operator declarator