Recognize the MS inheritance attributes and turn them into attributes
on the RecordDecl. Persist the MS portability type attributes and
ignore them in Sema rather than the parser.
Patch by João Matos!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@157288 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
index 0b5c396..c75e138 100644
--- a/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/Parse/ParseDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -900,6 +900,17 @@
return Actions.ActOnTypeName(getCurScope(), DeclaratorInfo);
}
+void Parser::ParseMicrosoftInheritanceClassAttributes(ParsedAttributes &attrs) {
+ while (Tok.is(tok::kw___single_inheritance) ||
+ Tok.is(tok::kw___multiple_inheritance) ||
+ Tok.is(tok::kw___virtual_inheritance)) {
+ IdentifierInfo *AttrName = Tok.getIdentifierInfo();
+ SourceLocation AttrNameLoc = ConsumeToken();
+ attrs.addNew(AttrName, AttrNameLoc, 0, AttrNameLoc, 0,
+ SourceLocation(), 0, 0, false);
+ }
+}
+
/// ParseClassSpecifier - Parse a C++ class-specifier [C++ class] or
/// elaborated-type-specifier [C++ dcl.type.elab]; we can't tell which
/// until we reach the start of a definition or see a token that
@@ -985,6 +996,12 @@
while (Tok.is(tok::kw___declspec))
ParseMicrosoftDeclSpec(attrs);
+ // Parse inheritance specifiers.
+ if (Tok.is(tok::kw___single_inheritance) ||
+ Tok.is(tok::kw___multiple_inheritance) ||
+ Tok.is(tok::kw___virtual_inheritance))
+ ParseMicrosoftInheritanceClassAttributes(attrs);
+
// If C++0x attributes exist here, parse them.
// FIXME: Are we consistent with the ordering of parsing of different
// styles of attributes?