Splitting the duplicated decl spec extension warning into two: one is an ExtWarn and the other a vanilla warning. This addresses PR13705, where const char const * wouldn't warn unless -pedantic was specified under the right conditions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@162793 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Misc/warning-flags.c b/test/Misc/warning-flags.c
index 06c70eb..5968851 100644
--- a/test/Misc/warning-flags.c
+++ b/test/Misc/warning-flags.c
@@ -181,4 +181,4 @@
The list of warnings in -Wpedantic should NEVER grow.
-CHECK: Number in -Wpedantic (not covered by other -W flags): 39
+CHECK: Number in -Wpedantic (not covered by other -W flags): 38
diff --git a/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp b/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
index 30ac279..290b947 100644
--- a/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
+++ b/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fsyntax-only -triple i386-linux -pedantic %s
+const char const *x10; // expected-warning {{duplicate 'const' declaration specifier}}
+
int x(*g); // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'g'}}
struct Type {
diff --git a/test/Parser/cxx0x-decl.cpp b/test/Parser/cxx0x-decl.cpp
index a6fc49c..e97ba1e 100644
--- a/test/Parser/cxx0x-decl.cpp
+++ b/test/Parser/cxx0x-decl.cpp
@@ -26,5 +26,7 @@
void i() = delete;;; // expected-warning {{extra ';' after member function definition}}
};
-int *const const p = 0; // ok
+// This is technically okay, but not likely what the user expects, so we will
+// pedantically warn on it
+int *const const p = 0; // expected-warning {{duplicate 'const' declaration specifier}}
const const int *q = 0; // expected-warning {{duplicate 'const' declaration specifier}}