During template instantiation, set the naming class of
UnresolvedLookupExpr and UnresolvedMemberExpr by substituting the
naming class we computed when building the expression in the
template...
... which we didn't always do correctly. Teach
UnresolvedMemberExpr::getNamingClass() all about the new
representation of injected-class-names in templates, so that it can
return a naming class that is the current instantiation.
Also, when decomposing a template-id into its template name and its
arguments, be sure to set the naming class on the LookupResult
structure.
Fixes PR6947 the right way.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@102448 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp b/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
index 5f90809..c394e47 100644
--- a/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/ExprCXX.cpp
@@ -728,15 +728,15 @@
// If there was a nested name specifier, it names the naming class.
// It can't be dependent: after all, we were actually able to do the
// lookup.
- const RecordType *RT;
+ CXXRecordDecl *Record = 0;
if (getQualifier()) {
Type *T = getQualifier()->getAsType();
assert(T && "qualifier in member expression does not name type");
- RT = T->getAs<RecordType>();
- assert(RT && "qualifier in member expression does not name record");
-
+ Record = T->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ assert(Record && "qualifier in member expression does not name record");
+ }
// Otherwise the naming class must have been the base class.
- } else {
+ else {
QualType BaseType = getBaseType().getNonReferenceType();
if (isArrow()) {
const PointerType *PT = BaseType->getAs<PointerType>();
@@ -744,11 +744,11 @@
BaseType = PT->getPointeeType();
}
- RT = BaseType->getAs<RecordType>();
- assert(RT && "base of member expression does not name record");
+ Record = BaseType->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
+ assert(Record && "base of member expression does not name record");
}
- return cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl());
+ return Record;
}
Stmt::child_iterator UnresolvedMemberExpr::child_begin() {