Make sure Sema::CheckIncrementDecrementOperand() removes typedefs when doing it's analysis.
Thanks to Seo Sanghyeon for his excellent (first) bug fix!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@43994 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
index bd210c3..31c09be 100644
--- a/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ b/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@
assert(!resType.isNull() && "no type for increment/decrement expression");
// C99 6.5.2.4p1: We allow complex as a GCC extension.
- if (const PointerType *pt = dyn_cast<PointerType>(resType)) {
+ if (const PointerType *pt = resType->getAsPointerType()) {
if (!pt->getPointeeType()->isObjectType()) { // C99 6.5.2.4p2, 6.5.6p2
Diag(OpLoc, diag::err_typecheck_arithmetic_incomplete_type,
resType.getAsString(), op->getSourceRange());
diff --git a/test/Sema/check-increment.c b/test/Sema/check-increment.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4447feb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Sema/check-increment.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// RUN: clang -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+typedef int *pint;
+int main() {
+ int a[5] = {0};
+ pint p = a;
+ p++;
+ printf("%d\n", *p);
+}