Don't report ambiguities in the user-defined conversion if we weren't supposed
to be considering user-defined conversions in the first place.
Doug, please review; I'm not sure what we should be doing if we see a real
ambiguity in selecting a copy constructor when otherwise suppressing
user-defined conversions.
Fixes PR6014.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@93365 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
index 0a2508d..acd1e50 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/overload-call.cpp
@@ -317,3 +317,19 @@
}
}
+// PR 6014
+namespace test2 {
+ struct QFixed {
+ QFixed(int i);
+ QFixed(long i);
+ };
+
+ bool operator==(const QFixed &f, int i);
+
+ class qrgb666 {
+ inline operator unsigned int () const;
+
+ inline bool operator==(const qrgb666 &v) const;
+ inline bool operator!=(const qrgb666 &v) const { return !(*this == v); }
+ };
+}