I concur with DPG here. This does indeed apply in 0x mode. Added test
cases that demonstrates exactly why this does indeed apply in 0x mode.
If isPOD is currently broken in 0x mode, we should fix that directly
rather than papering over it here.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@130007 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/scope-check.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/scope-check.cpp
index d462af0..3a90cc0 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/scope-check.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/scope-check.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fblocks %s -Wno-unreachable-code
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fblocks -std=gnu++0x %s -Wno-unreachable-code
namespace test0 {
struct D { ~D(); };
@@ -151,3 +152,22 @@
l2: x++;
}
}
+
+namespace test9 {
+ struct S { int i; };
+ void test1() {
+ goto foo;
+ S s;
+ foo:
+ return;
+ }
+ unsigned test2(unsigned x, unsigned y) {
+ switch (x) {
+ case 2:
+ S s;
+ if (y > 42) return x + y;
+ default:
+ return x - 2;
+ }
+ }
+}