When overload resolution picks an implicitly-deleted special member
function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of
special member function (default constructor, copy assignment
operator, etc.) and that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where
we can provide more detailed information later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@150611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
index 559c301..f8ee767 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/implicit-exception-spec.cpp
@@ -54,10 +54,9 @@
// The same problem arises in delayed parsing of default arguments,
// which clang does not yet support.
namespace DefaultArgument {
- // FIXME: this diagnostic is completely wrong.
- struct Default { // expected-note {{explicitly marked deleted here}}
+ struct Default { // expected-note {{defined here}}
struct T {
- T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor}}
+ T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted default constructor}}
} t;
};
}