fix a bunch of comment typos found by codespell. Patch by
Luis Felipe Strano Moraes!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@129559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Analysis/bstring.c b/test/Analysis/bstring.c
index 08b93c6..c5847fe 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/bstring.c
+++ b/test/Analysis/bstring.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
// Some functions are implemented as builtins. These should be #defined as
// BUILTIN(f), which will prepend "__builtin_" if USE_BUILTINS is defined.
-// Functions that have variants and are also availabe as builtins should be
+// Functions that have variants and are also available as builtins should be
// declared carefully! See memcpy() for an example.
#ifdef USE_BUILTINS
diff --git a/test/Analysis/idempotent-operations.c b/test/Analysis/idempotent-operations.c
index 004a345..10bd9ff 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/idempotent-operations.c
+++ b/test/Analysis/idempotent-operations.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
// Check that assignments filter out false positives correctly
int false7() {
- int zero = 0; // psuedo-constant
+ int zero = 0; // pseudo-constant
int one = 1;
int a = 55;
diff --git a/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m b/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
index e9459ef..649c4b0 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
+++ b/test/Analysis/misc-ps-eager-assume.m
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// <rdar://problem/7342806>
-// This false positive occured because the symbolic constraint on a short was
+// This false positive occurred because the symbolic constraint on a short was
// not maintained via sign extension. The analyzer doesn't properly handle
// the sign extension, but now tracks the constraint. This particular
// case relies on -analyzer-eagerly-assume because of the expression
diff --git a/test/Analysis/string.c b/test/Analysis/string.c
index a68b4d7..810258a 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/string.c
+++ b/test/Analysis/string.c
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
// Some functions are implemented as builtins. These should be #defined as
// BUILTIN(f), which will prepend "__builtin_" if USE_BUILTINS is defined.
-// Functions that have variants and are also availabe as builtins should be
+// Functions that have variants and are also available as builtins should be
// declared carefully! See memcpy() for an example.
#ifdef USE_BUILTINS