Stephen Hines | 6bcf27b | 2014-05-29 04:14:42 -0700 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | //===- ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ --*-===//
|
| 2 | //
|
| 3 | // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
| 4 | //
|
| 5 | // This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
| 6 | // License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
| 7 | //
|
| 8 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
| 9 | // This file defines a representation for logical expressions with SExpr leaves
|
| 10 | // that are used as part of fact-checking capability expressions.
|
| 11 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 | #include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafetyLogical.h"
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 | using namespace llvm;
|
| 16 | using namespace clang::threadSafety::lexpr;
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 | // Implication. We implement De Morgan's Laws by maintaining LNeg and RNeg
|
| 19 | // to keep track of whether LHS and RHS are negated.
|
| 20 | static bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, bool LNeg, const LExpr *RHS, bool RNeg) {
|
| 21 | // In comments below, we write => for implication.
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 | // Calculates the logical AND implication operator.
|
| 24 | const auto LeftAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
|
| 25 | return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) &&
|
| 26 | implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
|
| 27 | };
|
| 28 | const auto RightAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
|
| 29 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) &&
|
| 30 | implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg);
|
| 31 | };
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 | // Calculates the logical OR implication operator.
|
| 34 | const auto LeftOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
|
| 35 | return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) ||
|
| 36 | implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
|
| 37 | };
|
| 38 | const auto RightOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) {
|
| 39 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) ||
|
| 40 | implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg);
|
| 41 | };
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 | // Recurse on right.
|
| 44 | switch (RHS->kind()) {
|
| 45 | case LExpr::And:
|
| 46 | // When performing right recursion:
|
| 47 | // C => A & B [if] C => A and C => B
|
| 48 | // When performing right recursion (negated):
|
| 49 | // C => !(A & B) [if] C => !A | !B [===] C => !A or C => !B
|
| 50 | return RNeg ? RightOrOperator(cast<And>(RHS))
|
| 51 | : RightAndOperator(cast<And>(RHS));
|
| 52 | case LExpr::Or:
|
| 53 | // When performing right recursion:
|
| 54 | // C => (A | B) [if] C => A or C => B
|
| 55 | // When performing right recursion (negated):
|
| 56 | // C => !(A | B) [if] C => !A & !B [===] C => !A and C => !B
|
| 57 | return RNeg ? RightAndOperator(cast<Or>(RHS))
|
| 58 | : RightOrOperator(cast<Or>(RHS));
|
| 59 | case LExpr::Not:
|
| 60 | // Note that C => !A is very different from !(C => A). It would be incorrect
|
| 61 | // to return !implies(LHS, RHS).
|
| 62 | return implies(LHS, LNeg, cast<Not>(RHS)->exp(), !RNeg);
|
| 63 | case LExpr::Terminal:
|
| 64 | // After reaching the terminal, it's time to recurse on the left.
|
| 65 | break;
|
| 66 | }
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 | // RHS is now a terminal. Recurse on Left.
|
| 69 | switch (LHS->kind()) {
|
| 70 | case LExpr::And:
|
| 71 | // When performing left recursion:
|
| 72 | // A & B => C [if] A => C or B => C
|
| 73 | // When performing left recursion (negated):
|
| 74 | // !(A & B) => C [if] !A | !B => C [===] !A => C and !B => C
|
| 75 | return LNeg ? LeftAndOperator(cast<And>(LHS))
|
| 76 | : LeftOrOperator(cast<And>(LHS));
|
| 77 | case LExpr::Or:
|
| 78 | // When performing left recursion:
|
| 79 | // A | B => C [if] A => C and B => C
|
| 80 | // When performing left recursion (negated):
|
| 81 | // !(A | B) => C [if] !A & !B => C [===] !A => C or !B => C
|
| 82 | return LNeg ? LeftOrOperator(cast<Or>(LHS))
|
| 83 | : LeftAndOperator(cast<Or>(LHS));
|
| 84 | case LExpr::Not:
|
| 85 | // Note that A => !C is very different from !(A => C). It would be incorrect
|
| 86 | // to return !implies(LHS, RHS).
|
| 87 | return implies(cast<Not>(LHS)->exp(), !LNeg, RHS, RNeg);
|
| 88 | case LExpr::Terminal:
|
| 89 | // After reaching the terminal, it's time to perform identity comparisons.
|
| 90 | break;
|
| 91 | }
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 | // A => A
|
| 94 | // !A => !A
|
| 95 | if (LNeg != RNeg)
|
| 96 | return false;
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 | // FIXME -- this should compare SExprs for equality, not pointer equality.
|
| 99 | return cast<Terminal>(LHS)->expr() == cast<Terminal>(RHS)->expr();
|
| 100 | }
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 | namespace clang {
|
| 103 | namespace threadSafety {
|
| 104 | namespace lexpr {
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 | bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, const LExpr *RHS) {
|
| 107 | // Start out by assuming that LHS and RHS are not negated.
|
| 108 | return ::implies(LHS, false, RHS, false);
|
| 109 | }
|
| 110 | }
|
| 111 | }
|
| 112 | }
|