Fix signed vs unsigned printf format strings for block and inode numbers
There were still some %d's lurking when we print blocks & inodes; also
many of the counters in the e2fsck_struct were signed, and probably
need to be unsigned to avoid overflows.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
diff --git a/misc/mke2fs.c b/misc/mke2fs.c
index 01ef546..05ee9d8 100644
--- a/misc/mke2fs.c
+++ b/misc/mke2fs.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
errcode_t retval;
char buf[1024];
- sprintf(buf, "badblocks -b %d -X %s%s%s %d", fs->blocksize,
+ sprintf(buf, "badblocks -b %d -X %s%s%s %u", fs->blocksize,
quiet ? "" : "-s ", (cflag > 1) ? "-w " : "",
fs->device_name, fs->super->s_blocks_count);
if (verbose)
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@
if (ext2fs_badblocks_list_test(bb_list, i)) {
fprintf(stderr, _("Block %d in primary "
"superblock/group descriptor area bad.\n"), i);
- fprintf(stderr, _("Blocks %u through %d must be good "
+ fprintf(stderr, _("Blocks %u through %u must be good "
"in order to build a filesystem.\n"),
fs->super->s_first_data_block, must_be_good);
fputs(_("Aborting....\n"), stderr);