Fixed a small grammatical error.
Explained that function return types cannot be aggregate types.
Explained that functions with the same name but different type signatures
are considered to be different functions.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@10230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/docs/LangRef.html b/docs/LangRef.html
index 05de0bd..553035e 100644
--- a/docs/LangRef.html
+++ b/docs/LangRef.html
@@ -407,9 +407,12 @@
<h5>Overview:</h5>
<p>The function type can be thought of as a function signature. It
consists of a return type and a list of formal parameter types.
-Function types are usually used when to build virtual function tables
+Function types are usually used to build virtual function tables
(which are structures of pointers to functions), for indirect function
calls, and when defining a function.</p>
+<p>
+The return type of a function type cannot be an aggregate type.
+</p>
<h5>Syntax:</h5>
<pre> <returntype> (<parameter list>)<br></pre>
<p>Where '<tt><parameter list></tt>' is a comma-separated list of
@@ -638,6 +641,12 @@
to have predecessor basic blocks (i.e. there can not be any branches to
the entry block of a function). Because the block can have no
predecessors, it also cannot have any <a href="#i_phi">PHI nodes</a>.</p>
+<p>
+LLVM functions are identified by their name and type signature. Hence, two
+functions with the same name but different parameter lists or return values
+are considered different functions, and LLVM will resolves references to each
+appropriately.
+</p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section"> <a name="instref">Instruction Reference</a> </div>