Add support for the notion of "hidden" relocations. On MachO, these are relocation entries that are used as additional information for other, real relocations, rather than being relocations themselves.
I'm not familiar enough with ELF or COFF to know if they should have any relocations marked hidden.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@142961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp b/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
index c2480df..c0486de 100644
--- a/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
+++ b/tools/llvm-objdump/llvm-objdump.cpp
@@ -301,9 +301,15 @@
// Print relocation for instruction.
while (rel_cur != rel_end) {
+ bool hidden = false;
uint64_t addr;
SmallString<16> name;
SmallString<32> val;
+
+ // If this relocation is hidden, skip it.
+ if (error(rel_cur->getHidden(hidden))) goto skip_print_rel;
+ if (hidden) goto skip_print_rel;
+
if (error(rel_cur->getAddress(addr))) goto skip_print_rel;
// Stop when rel_cur's address is past the current instruction.
if (addr >= Index + Size) break;
@@ -336,9 +342,12 @@
ri != re; ri.increment(ec)) {
if (error(ec)) return;
+ bool hidden;
uint64_t address;
SmallString<32> relocname;
SmallString<32> valuestr;
+ if (error(ri->getHidden(hidden))) continue;
+ if (hidden) continue;
if (error(ri->getTypeName(relocname))) continue;
if (error(ri->getAddress(address))) continue;
if (error(ri->getValueString(valuestr))) continue;