Fix for PR340: Verifier misses malformed switch instruction
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@13618 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
index dfd13c9..b69511b 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
@@ -173,6 +173,7 @@
void visitInstruction(Instruction &I);
void visitTerminatorInst(TerminatorInst &I);
void visitReturnInst(ReturnInst &RI);
+ void visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst &SI);
void visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI);
void visitUserOp1(Instruction &I);
void visitUserOp2(Instruction &I) { visitUserOp1(I); }
@@ -362,6 +363,17 @@
visitTerminatorInst(RI);
}
+void Verifier::visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst &SI) {
+ // Check to make sure that all of the constants in the switch instruction
+ // have the same type as the switched-on value.
+ const Type *SwitchTy = SI.getCondition()->getType();
+ for (unsigned i = 1, e = SI.getNumCases(); i != e; ++i)
+ Assert1(SI.getCaseValue(i)->getType() == SwitchTy,
+ "Switch constants must all be same type as switch value!", &SI);
+
+ visitTerminatorInst(SI);
+}
+
void Verifier::visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI) {
Assert1(SI.getCondition()->getType() == Type::BoolTy,
"Select condition type must be bool!", &SI);