Improve formatting of licensing section.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@9505 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/docs/FAQ.html b/docs/FAQ.html
index 6b60272..ca03891 100644
--- a/docs/FAQ.html
+++ b/docs/FAQ.html
@@ -23,23 +23,23 @@
less restrictive</em> license, in particular one that does not
compel users who distribute tools based on modifying the source to
redistribute the modified source code as well.
-
+ <p>
<dt><b>Does the Illinois Open Source License really qualify
as an "open source" license?</b>
<dd>The
<a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/UoI-NCSA.php">
UI Open Source License</a> is certified by the
Open Source Initiative (OSI).
-
+ <p>
<dt> <b>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute the modified
source?</b>
<dd>
Yes. The modified source distribution must retain notice both the
copyright notice and follow the three bulletted conditions listed in
the <a href="releases/1.0/LICENSE.txt">LLVM license</a>.
-
+ <p>
<dt> <b>Can I modify LLVM source code and redistribute binaries or
- other tools based on it, without redistributing the source.
+ other tools based on it, without redistributing the source?</b>
<dd>
Yes, this is why we distribute LLVM under a less restrictive license
than GPL, as explained in the first question above.