The hasMemory argument is irrelevant to how the argument
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
index 70c63f6..e1c5845 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder.cpp
@@ -5340,7 +5340,7 @@
}
// Compute the constraint code and ConstraintType to use.
- TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, OpInfo.CallOperand, hasMemory, &DAG);
+ TLI.ComputeConstraintToUse(OpInfo, OpInfo.CallOperand, &DAG);
// If this is a memory input, and if the operand is not indirect, do what we
// need to to provide an address for the memory input.
@@ -5542,7 +5542,7 @@
std::vector<SDValue> Ops;
TLI.LowerAsmOperandForConstraint(InOperandVal, OpInfo.ConstraintCode[0],
- hasMemory, Ops, DAG);
+ Ops, DAG);
if (Ops.empty())
report_fatal_error("Invalid operand for inline asm constraint '" +
Twine(OpInfo.ConstraintCode) + "'!");