The hasMemory argument is irrelevant to how the argument
for an "i" constraint should get lowered; PR 6309. While
this argument was passed around a lot, this is the only
place it was used, so it goes away from a lot of other
places.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@106893 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index bfd689b..7ad0d38 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -2383,7 +2383,6 @@
/// vector. If it is invalid, don't add anything to Ops.
void TargetLowering::LowerAsmOperandForConstraint(SDValue Op,
char ConstraintLetter,
- bool hasMemory,
std::vector<SDValue> &Ops,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
switch (ConstraintLetter) {
@@ -2544,7 +2543,7 @@
/// 'm' over 'r', for example.
///
static void ChooseConstraint(TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo,
- bool hasMemory, const TargetLowering &TLI,
+ const TargetLowering &TLI,
SDValue Op, SelectionDAG *DAG) {
assert(OpInfo.Codes.size() > 1 && "Doesn't have multiple constraint options");
unsigned BestIdx = 0;
@@ -2564,7 +2563,7 @@
assert(OpInfo.Codes[i].size() == 1 &&
"Unhandled multi-letter 'other' constraint");
std::vector<SDValue> ResultOps;
- TLI.LowerAsmOperandForConstraint(Op, OpInfo.Codes[i][0], hasMemory,
+ TLI.LowerAsmOperandForConstraint(Op, OpInfo.Codes[i][0],
ResultOps, *DAG);
if (!ResultOps.empty()) {
BestType = CType;
@@ -2591,7 +2590,6 @@
/// OpInfo.ConstraintCode and OpInfo.ConstraintType.
void TargetLowering::ComputeConstraintToUse(AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo,
SDValue Op,
- bool hasMemory,
SelectionDAG *DAG) const {
assert(!OpInfo.Codes.empty() && "Must have at least one constraint");
@@ -2600,7 +2598,7 @@
OpInfo.ConstraintCode = OpInfo.Codes[0];
OpInfo.ConstraintType = getConstraintType(OpInfo.ConstraintCode);
} else {
- ChooseConstraint(OpInfo, hasMemory, *this, Op, DAG);
+ ChooseConstraint(OpInfo, *this, Op, DAG);
}
// 'X' matches anything.