Reapply address space patch after fixing an issue in MemCopyOptimizer.
Added support for address spaces and added a isVolatile field to memcpy, memmove, and memset,
e.g., llvm.memcpy.i32(i8*, i8*, i32, i32) -> llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8*, i8*, i32, i32, i1)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@100304 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
index 3643ea7..7291c5a 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
@@ -3263,7 +3263,8 @@
static SDValue getMemcpyLoadsAndStores(SelectionDAG &DAG, DebugLoc dl,
SDValue Chain, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, uint64_t Size,
- unsigned Align, bool AlwaysInline,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol,
+ bool AlwaysInline,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff,
const Value *SrcSV, uint64_t SrcSVOff) {
// Turn a memcpy of undef to nop.
@@ -3322,7 +3323,7 @@
Value = getMemsetStringVal(VT, dl, DAG, TLI, Str, SrcOff);
Store = DAG.getStore(Chain, dl, Value,
getMemBasePlusOffset(Dst, DstOff, DAG),
- DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, false, false, Align);
+ DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, isVol, false, Align);
} else {
// The type might not be legal for the target. This should only happen
// if the type is smaller than a legal type, as on PPC, so the right
@@ -3333,11 +3334,11 @@
assert(NVT.bitsGE(VT));
Value = DAG.getExtLoad(ISD::EXTLOAD, dl, NVT, Chain,
getMemBasePlusOffset(Src, SrcOff, DAG),
- SrcSV, SrcSVOff + SrcOff, VT, false, false,
+ SrcSV, SrcSVOff + SrcOff, VT, isVol, false,
MinAlign(SrcAlign, SrcOff));
Store = DAG.getTruncStore(Chain, dl, Value,
getMemBasePlusOffset(Dst, DstOff, DAG),
- DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, VT, false, false,
+ DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, VT, isVol, false,
Align);
}
OutChains.push_back(Store);
@@ -3352,7 +3353,8 @@
static SDValue getMemmoveLoadsAndStores(SelectionDAG &DAG, DebugLoc dl,
SDValue Chain, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, uint64_t Size,
- unsigned Align,bool AlwaysInline,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol,
+ bool AlwaysInline,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff,
const Value *SrcSV, uint64_t SrcSVOff) {
// Turn a memmove of undef to nop.
@@ -3403,7 +3405,7 @@
Value = DAG.getLoad(VT, dl, Chain,
getMemBasePlusOffset(Src, SrcOff, DAG),
- SrcSV, SrcSVOff + SrcOff, false, false, SrcAlign);
+ SrcSV, SrcSVOff + SrcOff, isVol, false, SrcAlign);
LoadValues.push_back(Value);
LoadChains.push_back(Value.getValue(1));
SrcOff += VTSize;
@@ -3418,7 +3420,7 @@
Store = DAG.getStore(Chain, dl, LoadValues[i],
getMemBasePlusOffset(Dst, DstOff, DAG),
- DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, false, false, Align);
+ DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, isVol, false, Align);
OutChains.push_back(Store);
DstOff += VTSize;
}
@@ -3430,7 +3432,7 @@
static SDValue getMemsetStores(SelectionDAG &DAG, DebugLoc dl,
SDValue Chain, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, uint64_t Size,
- unsigned Align,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff) {
// Turn a memset of undef to nop.
if (Src.getOpcode() == ISD::UNDEF)
@@ -3472,7 +3474,7 @@
SDValue Value = getMemsetValue(Src, VT, DAG, dl);
SDValue Store = DAG.getStore(Chain, dl, Value,
getMemBasePlusOffset(Dst, DstOff, DAG),
- DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, false, false, 0);
+ DstSV, DstSVOff + DstOff, isVol, false, 0);
OutChains.push_back(Store);
DstOff += VTSize;
}
@@ -3483,7 +3485,7 @@
SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemcpy(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, SDValue Size,
- unsigned Align, bool AlwaysInline,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol, bool AlwaysInline,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff,
const Value *SrcSV, uint64_t SrcSVOff) {
@@ -3497,7 +3499,7 @@
SDValue Result = getMemcpyLoadsAndStores(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src,
ConstantSize->getZExtValue(),Align,
- false, DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
+ isVol, false, DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
}
@@ -3506,7 +3508,7 @@
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
TLI.EmitTargetCodeForMemcpy(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align,
- AlwaysInline,
+ isVol, AlwaysInline,
DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
@@ -3516,11 +3518,12 @@
if (AlwaysInline) {
assert(ConstantSize && "AlwaysInline requires a constant size!");
return getMemcpyLoadsAndStores(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src,
- ConstantSize->getZExtValue(), Align, true,
- DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
+ ConstantSize->getZExtValue(), Align, isVol,
+ true, DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
}
// Emit a library call.
+ assert(!isVol && "library memcpy does not support volatile");
TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args;
TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry;
Entry.Ty = TLI.getTargetData()->getIntPtrType(*getContext());
@@ -3541,7 +3544,7 @@
SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemmove(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, SDValue Size,
- unsigned Align,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff,
const Value *SrcSV, uint64_t SrcSVOff) {
@@ -3555,8 +3558,8 @@
SDValue Result =
getMemmoveLoadsAndStores(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src,
- ConstantSize->getZExtValue(),
- Align, false, DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
+ ConstantSize->getZExtValue(), Align, isVol,
+ false, DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
}
@@ -3564,12 +3567,13 @@
// Then check to see if we should lower the memmove with target-specific
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
- TLI.EmitTargetCodeForMemmove(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align,
+ TLI.EmitTargetCodeForMemmove(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align, isVol,
DstSV, DstSVOff, SrcSV, SrcSVOff);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
// Emit a library call.
+ assert(!isVol && "library memmove does not support volatile");
TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args;
TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry;
Entry.Ty = TLI.getTargetData()->getIntPtrType(*getContext());
@@ -3590,7 +3594,7 @@
SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemset(SDValue Chain, DebugLoc dl, SDValue Dst,
SDValue Src, SDValue Size,
- unsigned Align,
+ unsigned Align, bool isVol,
const Value *DstSV, uint64_t DstSVOff) {
// Check to see if we should lower the memset to stores first.
@@ -3601,9 +3605,10 @@
if (ConstantSize->isNullValue())
return Chain;
- SDValue Result = getMemsetStores(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src,
- ConstantSize->getZExtValue(),
- Align, DstSV, DstSVOff);
+ SDValue Result =
+ getMemsetStores(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, ConstantSize->getZExtValue(),
+ Align, isVol, DstSV, DstSVOff);
+
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
}
@@ -3611,12 +3616,13 @@
// Then check to see if we should lower the memset with target-specific
// code. If the target chooses to do this, this is the next best.
SDValue Result =
- TLI.EmitTargetCodeForMemset(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align,
+ TLI.EmitTargetCodeForMemset(*this, dl, Chain, Dst, Src, Size, Align, isVol,
DstSV, DstSVOff);
if (Result.getNode())
return Result;
// Emit a library call.
+ assert(!isVol && "library memset does not support volatile");
const Type *IntPtrTy = TLI.getTargetData()->getIntPtrType(*getContext());
TargetLowering::ArgListTy Args;
TargetLowering::ArgListEntry Entry;