Hopefully final tweak to this testcase
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@5626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Analysis/BasicAA/licmtest.ll b/test/Analysis/BasicAA/licmtest.ll
index 1e4255d..d838e6c 100644
--- a/test/Analysis/BasicAA/licmtest.ll
+++ b/test/Analysis/BasicAA/licmtest.ll
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
; Test that LICM uses basicaa to do alias analysis, which is capable of
-; disambiguating some obvious cases. The ToRemove load should be eliminated
-; in this testcase. This testcase was carefully contrived so that GCSE would
-; not be able to eliminate the load itself, without licm's help. This is
-; because, for GCSE, the load is killed by the dummy basic block.
+; disambiguating some obvious cases. If LICM is able to disambiguate the
+; two pointers, then the load should be hoisted, and the store sunk. Thus
+; the loop becomes empty and can be deleted by ADCE.
-; RUN: if as < %s | opt -basicaa -licm -load-vn -gcse -instcombine | dis | grep ToRemove
+; RUN: if as < %s | opt -basicaa -licm --adce | dis | grep Loop
; RUN: then exit 1
; RUN: else exit 0
; RUN: fi
@@ -15,7 +14,7 @@
int %test(bool %c) {
%Atmp = load int* %A
- br bool %c, label %Dummy, label %Loop
+ br label %Loop
Loop:
%ToRemove = load int* %A
store int %Atmp, int* %B ; Store cannot alias %A
@@ -24,9 +23,5 @@
Out:
%X = sub int %ToRemove, %Atmp
ret int %X
-
-Dummy:
- store int 7, int* %A
- br label %Loop
}