merge all the llvm-gcc pieces together. Recommend that people try dragonegg if they care about fortran performance.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115031 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/docs/ReleaseNotes.html b/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
index b6b2ef2..8bb4739 100644
--- a/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
+++ b/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
@@ -732,6 +732,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
+<p>The C backend has numerous problems and is not being actively maintained.
+Depending on it for anything serious is not advised.</p>
+
<ul>
<li><a href="http://llvm.org/PR802">The C backend has only basic support for
inline assembly code</a>.</li>
@@ -747,40 +750,27 @@
<!-- ======================================================================= -->
<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="c-fe">Known problems with the llvm-gcc C and C++ front-end</a>
+ <a name="llvm-gcc">Known problems with the llvm-gcc front-end</a>
</div>
<div class="doc_text">
-<p>The only major language feature of GCC not supported by llvm-gcc is
- the <tt>__builtin_apply</tt> family of builtins. However, some extensions
- are only supported on some targets. For example, trampolines are only
- supported on some targets (these are used when you take the address of a
- nested function).</p>
+<p>llvm-gcc is generally very stable for the C family of languages. The only
+ major language feature of GCC not supported by llvm-gcc is the
+ <tt>__builtin_apply</tt> family of builtins. However, some extensions
+ are only supported on some targets. For example, trampolines are only
+ supported on some targets (these are used when you take the address of a
+ nested function).</p>
-</div>
+<p>Fortran support generally works, but there are still several unresolved bugs
+ in <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/">Bugzilla</a>. Please see the
+ tools/gfortran component for details. Note that llvm-gcc is missing major
+ Fortran performance work in the frontend and library that went into GCC after
+ 4.2. If you are interested in Fortran, we recommend that you consider using
+ <a href="#dragonegg">dragonegg</a> instead.</p>
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="fortran-fe">Known problems with the llvm-gcc Fortran front-end</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-<ul>
-<li>Fortran support generally works, but there are still several unresolved bugs
- in <a href="http://llvm.org/bugs/">Bugzilla</a>. Please see the
- tools/gfortran component for details.</li>
-</ul>
-</div>
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="ada-fe">Known problems with the llvm-gcc Ada front-end</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-The llvm-gcc 4.2 Ada compiler works fairly well; however, this is not a mature
-technology, and problems should be expected.
+<p>The llvm-gcc 4.2 Ada compiler has basic functionality. However, this is not a
+mature technology, and problems should be expected. For example:</p>
<ul>
<li>The Ada front-end currently only builds on X86-32. This is mainly due
to lack of trampoline support (pointers to nested functions) on other platforms.