Move a bunch of inline asm code out of line.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@50313 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index 6c15ff9..cd43349 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -1498,6 +1498,7 @@
// Inline Assembler Implementation Methods
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
TargetLowering::ConstraintType
TargetLowering::getConstraintType(const std::string &Constraint) const {
// FIXME: lots more standard ones to handle.
@@ -1647,6 +1648,102 @@
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Constraint Selection.
+
+/// getConstraintGenerality - Return an integer indicating how general CT
+/// is.
+static unsigned getConstraintGenerality(TargetLowering::ConstraintType CT) {
+ switch (CT) {
+ default: assert(0 && "Unknown constraint type!");
+ case TargetLowering::C_Other:
+ case TargetLowering::C_Unknown:
+ return 0;
+ case TargetLowering::C_Register:
+ return 1;
+ case TargetLowering::C_RegisterClass:
+ return 2;
+ case TargetLowering::C_Memory:
+ return 3;
+ }
+}
+
+/// ChooseConstraint - If there are multiple different constraints that we
+/// could pick for this operand (e.g. "imr") try to pick the 'best' one.
+/// This is somewhat tricky: constraints fall into three four classes:
+/// Other -> immediates and magic values
+/// Register -> one specific register
+/// RegisterClass -> a group of regs
+/// Memory -> memory
+/// Ideally, we would pick the most specific constraint possible: if we have
+/// something that fits into a register, we would pick it. The problem here
+/// is that if we have something that could either be in a register or in
+/// memory that use of the register could cause selection of *other*
+/// operands to fail: they might only succeed if we pick memory. Because of
+/// this the heuristic we use is:
+///
+/// 1) If there is an 'other' constraint, and if the operand is valid for
+/// that constraint, use it. This makes us take advantage of 'i'
+/// constraints when available.
+/// 2) Otherwise, pick the most general constraint present. This prefers
+/// 'm' over 'r', for example.
+///
+static void ChooseConstraint(TargetLowering::AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo,
+ const TargetLowering &TLI) {
+ assert(OpInfo.Codes.size() > 1 && "Doesn't have multiple constraint options");
+ unsigned BestIdx = 0;
+ TargetLowering::ConstraintType BestType = TargetLowering::C_Unknown;
+ int BestGenerality = -1;
+
+ // Loop over the options, keeping track of the most general one.
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = OpInfo.Codes.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ TargetLowering::ConstraintType CType =
+ TLI.getConstraintType(OpInfo.Codes[i]);
+
+ // This constraint letter is more general than the previous one, use it.
+ int Generality = getConstraintGenerality(CType);
+ if (Generality > BestGenerality) {
+ BestType = CType;
+ BestIdx = i;
+ BestGenerality = Generality;
+ }
+ }
+
+ OpInfo.ConstraintCode = OpInfo.Codes[BestIdx];
+ OpInfo.ConstraintType = BestType;
+}
+
+/// ComputeConstraintToUse - Determines the constraint code and constraint
+/// type to use for the specific AsmOperandInfo, setting
+/// OpInfo.ConstraintCode and OpInfo.ConstraintType.
+void TargetLowering::ComputeConstraintToUse(AsmOperandInfo &OpInfo) const {
+ assert(!OpInfo.Codes.empty() && "Must have at least one constraint");
+
+ // Single-letter constraints ('r') are very common.
+ if (OpInfo.Codes.size() == 1) {
+ OpInfo.ConstraintCode = OpInfo.Codes[0];
+ OpInfo.ConstraintType = getConstraintType(OpInfo.ConstraintCode);
+ } else {
+ ChooseConstraint(OpInfo, *this);
+ }
+
+ // 'X' matches anything.
+ if (OpInfo.ConstraintCode == "X" && OpInfo.CallOperandVal) {
+ // Labels and constants are handled elsewhere ('X' is the only thing
+ // that matches labels).
+ if (isa<BasicBlock>(OpInfo.CallOperandVal) ||
+ isa<ConstantInt>(OpInfo.CallOperandVal))
+ return;
+
+ // Otherwise, try to resolve it to something we know about by looking at
+ // the actual operand type.
+ if (const char *Repl = LowerXConstraint(OpInfo.ConstraintVT)) {
+ OpInfo.ConstraintCode = Repl;
+ OpInfo.ConstraintType = getConstraintType(OpInfo.ConstraintCode);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Loop Strength Reduction hooks
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//